Knowledge Management in the Information Age
"[S]ocial progress is lagging behind technological progress, and because of the rapid pace of change, the gap has never been larger between what could be and what is." 1
There is a global problem of making sense out of and learning from the fast-changing, "kaleidoscopic pictures of our knowledge landscapes" 1
To understand and respond to these kaleidoscopic pictures and recognise the opportunities and potential dangers within, "an organization must mobilize the distributed intelligence of its members and listen to the collective wisdom of the whole." 2
1. Por, G. (2001). Designing for the emergence of a global scale collective intelligence: Invitation to a research colloboration. Paper presented at Global Brain Workshop (Brussels, July, 2001).
2. Por, G. (2001). The knowledge ecology. BizEd, Nov, 30–33.
Wisdom

is effective use of

Intelligence

which is effective use of

Knowledge 3
3. Por, G. (2000). Knowledge to intelligence to wisdom: Essential value chain of the new economy. Paper presented at ”Consultation Meeting on the Future of Organizations and Knowledge Management” of the European Commission’s Directorate-General ”Information Society Technologies” (Brussels, May 23-24, 2000).
4. Por, G. (2000). Nurturing systemic wisdom through knowledge ecology. The Systems Thinker, 11(8), 1–5.
3. Por, G. (2000). Knowledge to intelligence to wisdom: Essential value chain of the new economy. Paper presented at ”Consultation Meeting on the Future of Organizations and Knowledge Management” of the European Commission’s Directorate-General ”Information Society Technologies” (Brussels, May 23-24, 2000).
4. Por, G. (2000). Nurturing systemic wisdom through knowledge ecology. The Systems Thinker, 11(8), 1–5.
2. Por, G. (2001). The knowledge ecology. BizEd, Nov, 30–33.
4. Por, G. (2000). Nurturing systemic wisdom through knowledge ecology. The Systems Thinker, 11(8), 1–5.
In its basic form it contains:
4. Por, G. (2000). Nurturing systemic wisdom through knowledge ecology. The Systems Thinker, 11(8), 1–5.
And seamless integration of the two4
4. Por, G. (2000). Nurturing systemic wisdom through knowledge ecology. The Systems Thinker, 11(8), 1–5.
Gain value from enabling networks to talk to each other.
4. Por, G. (2000). Nurturing systemic wisdom through knowledge ecology. The Systems Thinker, 11(8), 1–5.

Value is gained from integrating the 3 networks.4
4. Por, G. (2000). Nurturing systemic wisdom through knowledge ecology. The Systems Thinker, 11(8), 1–5.
After integrating the 3 networks and networks of productive conversation can be stored in rich repositories, the organisation witnesses a cycle of increasing returns.5

5. Por, G. (2000). The value of emergent value creation models in the knowledge economy: Towards a framework for analysis and action. Paper presented at ”Consultation Meeting on the Future of Organizations and Knowledge Management” of the European Commission’s Directorate-General ”Information Society Technologies” (Brussels, May 23-24, 2000).
Knowledge Ecosystem

effective use of knowledge


Collective Intelligence
The knowledge ecosystem benefits all involved.
6. Zboralski, K., & Gemnden, H. G. (2005). The impact of communities of practice. In E. Coakes & S. Clarke (Eds.), Encyclopedia of communities of practice in information and knowledge management (pp. 218–223). Information Science Reference.
Por, G. (2001). Designing for the emergence of a global scale collective intelligence: Invitation to a research colloboration. Paper presented at Global Brain Workshop (Brussels, July, 2001).
Por, G. (2001). The knowledge ecology. BizEd, Nov, 30–33.
Por, G. (2000). Knowledge to intelligence to wisdom: Essential value chain of the new economy. Paper presented at ”Consultation Meeting on the Future of Organizations and Knowledge Management” of the European Commission’s Directorate-General ”Information Society Technologies” (Brussels, May 23-24, 2000).
Por, G. (2000). Nurturing systemic wisdom through knowledge ecology. The Systems Thinker, 11(8), 1–5.
Por, G. (2000). The value of emergent value creation models in the knowledge economy: Towards a framework for analysis and action. Paper presented at ”Consultation Meeting on the Future of Organizations and Knowledge Management” of the European Commission’s Directorate-General ”Information Society Technologies” (Brussels, May 23-24, 2000).
Zboralski, K., & Gemnden, H. G. (2005). The impact of communities of practice. In E. Coakes & S. Clarke (Eds.), Encyclopedia of communities of practice in information and knowledge management (pp. 218–223). Information Science Reference.